Rollespil – at spille med figurer – kilderne

I et tidligere indlæg var brugen af figurer i rollespil og i særdeleshed Dungeons & Dragons godt oppe og vende, og inden vi går til anden del omkring brugen af figurer i rollespil, vil jeg lige tage et kig på kildernes udsagn om figurbrug. Udgangspunktet bliver først D&D og AD&D, som det var for 30 år siden og derefter et blik på, hvordan det kan se ud post D&D 4th ed.

Den røde æske

I spillerheftet til D&D Basic Rules Set (den røde æske)(1983) finder vi følgende afsnit om at spille med figurer (p.57):

Miniature Figures

As you try to imagine your characters and the areas they explore, it is helpful to use miniature figures to represent the characters and monsters. Several types of miniature figures are available from toy and hobby shops worldwide, made of metal or plastic and suitable for painting. You should be able to find figures that look very similar to your characters.

Official DUNGEONS & DRAGONS (R) figures are available.

To keep track of the party marching order, line up the miniature figures on the playing table. You may use a large piece of graph paper to draw the rooms and corridors found by the characters, and simply move the figures around on the paper. Several types of more permanent playing surfaces are available in plastic and vinyl, and the rooms drawn on them can easily be erased.

Scale movement: When using miniature figures on a playing surface, a ruler is used to determine distance moved. One inch represents 10 feet. A movement rate of 60′ per turn means that the figure moves 6 inches each turn. Spell ranges and other ranges are easily determined when an accurate scale is used.

Advanced Dungeons & Dragons

Vi kan nu tage et skridt længere tilbage i tid til AD&D 1st ed: Players Handbook (1978):


Organize your party by showing which characters are where. Show marching order for a 10′ passage, a 20′ passage, door openings, etc.

Always prepare for rear actions as well as frontal combats. Assign one individual as leader. This character will “call”, i.e. tell the referee where the party will go and what they will do. Miniature figures are of great aid here. The DM will usually require a marching order to be drawn on a piece of paper if figures are not at hand.

Og et lille skridt yderligere til AD&D 1st ed: Dungeon Masters Guide (1979):


The special figures cast for ADVANCED DUNGEONS & DRAGONS add color to play and make refereeing far easier. Each player might be required to furnish painted figures representing his or her player character and all henchmen and/or hirelings included in the game session. Such distinctively painted figures enable you to immediately recognize each individual involved. Figures can be placed so as to show their order of march, i.e., which characters are in the lead, which are in the middle, and which are bringing up the rear. Furthermore, players are more readily able to visualize their array and plan actions while seeing the reason for your restrictions on their actions. Monster figures are likewise most helpful, as many things become instantly apparent when a party is arrayed and their monster opponent(s) placed. Furnishing such monsters is probably best undertaken as a joint effort, the whole group contributing towards the purchase of such figurines on a regular basis. Be very careful to purchase castings which are in scale! Out of scale monsters are virtually worthless in many cases. As a rule of thumb, HO scale is 25 mm = 1 actual inch = 6’ in scale height or length or breadth.

Figure bases are necessarily broad in order to assure that the figures will stand in the proper position and not constantly be falling over. Because of this, it is usually necessary to use a ground scale twice that of the actual scale for HO, and squares of about 1 actual inch per side are suggested.

Each ground scale inch can then be used to equal 30 linear feet, so a 10’ wide scale corridor is 3 actual inches in width and shown as 3 separate squares. This allows depiction of the typical array of three figures abreast, and also enables easy handling of such figures when they are moved.

While you may not find it convenient to actually use such figures and floor plans to handle routine dungeon movement, having sheets of squares for encounter area depiction will probably be quite helpful. If you do so, be certain to remember that ground scale differs from figure scale, and when dealing with length, two man-sized figures per square is quite possible, as the space is actually 6 scale feet with respect to length. This is meaningful when attacking a snake, dragon, etc. if characters are able to attack the creature’s body length. With respect to basically bipedal, erect opponents, scale will not be a factor.

Details of preparation and painting of miniature figures for the game are not germane to this work. Your hobby supplier will have an assortment of small brushes and paints for such purposes, and you may inquire there as to the best techniques of painting.


Various products such as modules, playing aids, and miniature figurines will be most helpful in establishing and maintaining an interesting and exciting campaign. There are so many such products available that it is not possible to detail each here, but some guidance can be given.

Paper products range from record sheets for characters and special screens for the DM, which contain frequently-consulted charts and tables on his or her side, to complete dungeon or world scenarios. TSR provides a broad selection of such goods, some of which are listed at the back of this work.

You can obtain a complete list by writing to TSR at the address shown on the cover and asking for a current catalog. The outlet for TSR products in Great Britain is: TSR Hobbies (U.K. Limited), the Mill, Rathmore Road, Cambridge, CB1-4AD England. The only other source of approved and official AD8D material is Judges Guild, 1165 North University Ave., Decatur, IL 62526. Judges Guild publishes a large and continually expanding line of materials, and you should contact them for their current catalog. While there are many other works which appear to be useful in a campaign, only those bearing the ADVANCED DUNEONS 8 DRAGONS logo and approval mark should be used.

Miniature figures used to represent characters and monsters add color and life to the game. They also make the tosk of refereeing action, particularly combat, easier too! In combination with a gridded surface, such as the DUNGEON FLOORPLANS (to be published by TSR in the near future), these miniatures will add a whole new dimension to your playing enjoyment. It is suggested that you urge your players to provide painted figures representing their characters, henchmen, and hirelings involved in play.

The monsters can be furnished by you – possibly purchased through collection of small fees levied on each playing session. The OFFICIAL ADVANCED DUNGEONS & DRAGONS miniature figures will be released by Grenadier Models, POB 305, Springfield, PA 19064, about November 1979.

These figures are the only ones which comply in all respects to AD&D specifications and the ADBD MONSTER MANUAL. Contact Grenadier for an up-to-date listing of available figures. Other approved lines of fantasy figures APPROVED FOR USE WITH ADVANCED DUNGEONS 8 DRAGONS will be offered by select manufacturers. Always look for the name, ADVANCED DUNGEONS & DRAGONS, and the TSR approval mark before purchasing figures for your campaign.


Og fra noget af det ældste går vi nu til noget af det nyeste: Numenera (Core Rulebook)(2013):

Some players like to use miniatures, counters, or other tokens to represent their characters, particularly in a battlefield situation. Miniatures showing the location of the PCs, NPCs, and terrain features can be useful visual aids. They help people see who is closest to the door, which margr stands where, and who will be crushed if the dangerously
weak part of the ceiling caves in.


Often, players who use miniatures also use a grid to represent distance. If you do this, it’s probably best to say that each 1-inch (2.5 cm) square represents about 5 feet (1.5 m). Simply move your figure the right number of squares; for example, a short
distance would be 10 squares.

However, a grid isn’t necessary in Numenera.  Since most things have one of three possible distances—immediate, short, and long—that’s all you need to worry about. Thus, you could cut three lengths of string: one 2 inches (5 cm) long, one 10 inches (25 cm) long, and one 20 inches (51 cm) long. If something has immediate range, stretch the 2-inch (5 cm) string from the origin point to see how far it goes. Any character whose figure is within 2 inches (5 cm) of another figure can make a melee attack against that figure. (The attacker is assumed to move closer to the target, so slide the figures together.) If a character wants to move a short distance, use the 10-inch (25 cm) string to measure from her starting point to her intended destination. If the string can reach that far, so can she. For long range, anything you can reach with the 20-inch (51 cm) string is in range. Soon, you’ll find that you can eyeball the distances—precision isn’t that important.


In some games that use miniatures, the size of the miniature’s base is important. In Numenera, such precision isn’t necessary. However, it certainly helps if larger creatures have larger bases, representing that they take up more room.

Speaking of which, GMs are free to consider any appropriate creature “big.” An appropriate creature would likely be one that is more than 10 feet (3 m) tall or 10 feet (3 m) long. Big creatures don’t have to move their miniature when making a melee attack within immediate distance. They can just reach that far.

GMs can also designate some creatures “huge.” Huge creatures are 20 feet (6 m) tall or 20 feet (6 m) long. For them, immediate distance is a string 4 inches (10 cm) long—or four squares on a grid— and they don’t have to move to make melee attacks.

As a rule of thumb, the maximum number of attackers that can attack a single creature is the same as the number of figures whose bases can fit around the creature. In general, this means that larger creatures can be attacked by more assailants.

Tactical Play

When you use miniatures, some aspects of the game become more important, including range, movement, and special effects that move characters. If a character is knocked back, move his miniature back 1 or 2 inches (or squares), as appropriate.

That means terrain becomes important, too. If a deep chasm is nearby, the players need to know exactly where it is in relation to their figures in case they have the opportunity to knock a foe into that chasm (or face that same risk themselves).

Likewise, things to hide behind, the layout of interior chambers, and so on become important and must be depicted along with the miniatures. Many people enjoy playing this kind of game on a dry-erase or weterase surface so they can draw the features and place
the figures right in the action. Sketching them on paper works fine, too, as does using books, pencils,  or other things to represent ledges, walls, and so forth. And, of course, terrain pieces can be used for extra flavor. Some pieces are made of paper to keep them inexpensive.

Line of sight also becomes more important, and if you already cut a string to handle distance, it works for this purpose as well. Place the string anywhere on the base of the character taking the action, and stretch the string toward the target. If the string can
be stretched to any part of the base of the target, the attacker has line of sight.

Possible Drawbacks

The downside to using miniatures is that the exacting detail they offer sometimes gets in the way of the GM’s narrative control. For example, without miniatures, she can use GM intrusion to say, “You were standing on the trapdoor when it opens.” With miniatures, a player usually knows exactly where he is standing at any given moment.

Also, psychologically, miniatures seem to encourage combat. If you place a miniature on the game table representing a new creature that the PCs have encountered, some players assume that they need to engage with it in tactical combat rather than talk to it, sneak past it, or try some other course of action. (p.116-117)

Så hvad kan vi konkludere?

Anvendelsen af figurer kan være et praktisk redskab til at skabe overblik, og at nogen bruger dem til at få styr på kaoset i kamp, mens andre også bruger dem til de generelle bevægelser gennem hulerne, men en konsekvens er, at figurerne ikke kun repræsenterer fiktionen mellem spillerne, men at der er en feedback fra figurerne til fiktionen (jf. Monte Cooks bemærkninger), og selvom figurerne i sig selv ikke er eller ses, som en mekanik, så demonstrerer de at “system matters” for selvom de bare skal bringe styr på kaos, så “psychologically, miniatures seem to encourage combat”, og de skaber en absolutte placeringer i et ellers relativt rum.

Er der nogen måder, hvorpå figurer kan integreres på spændende måder i spillet? Er der andre eksempler fra andre udgivelser på figurbrug (som fortæller os noget om praksis og folks måde at spille på)?

Offentliggjort af Morten Greis

Historiker, etnolog, brygger, fægter, rollespiller, science fiction entusiast History and Ethnology, brewer and fencer, roleplayer and science fiction enthusiast

20 kommentarer til “Rollespil – at spille med figurer – kilderne

  1. Det er meget sjov med observationen: “psychologically, miniatures seem to encourage combat”. Jeg kan godt genkende det, men det skyldes måske også at jeg kun (i hvert fald i den senere tid) har oplevet figurer blive brugt i forbindelse med kamp. Ligesom der er et “ude af øje ude af sind”-element i theater of mind så er der også den modsatte effekt af at når monstret står lige der – som figur – så skal man jo gøre ngoet ved det. Og figurerne gør jo ikke det store i forhold til samtalen imellem spillerkarakter og NPC, så figurerne taler oplagt langt mere til at handle i det fysiske rum.

    Omvendt har jeg så også oplevet at i spil hvor der figurer på et bræt hele tiden – fx. Descent – så lægger figurerne på den anden side også op til at gøre en del andet end kamp (for så vidt spillet understøtter det). Ligesom man kan se monstret, så kan man også se den dør man kan løbe om bag ved, den kiste man lige kan løbe hen og åbne eller den sårede kamerat man kan komme til undsætning. Så jeg oplever at figurer giver et fokus på den fysiske verden og de ting man kan gøre i den – og hvis det primært/mest oplagt er kamp, så vil de nok give et fokus på kamp.

    Jeg kunne dog godt se noget sjovt i at prøve et udforskningsfokuseret spil hvor man havde figurer på et kort hele tiden, og hvor figurerne også kunne bruges til at udtrykke hvor man leder efter fælder og hemmelig døre, om man går hen og kigger ned i brønden og den slags. Hvis man ville have et fokus på parlay og kommunikation kunne man muligvis endda have retnignslinier for hvordan det betød noget hvor man stod i forhold til at indlede/være med i en samtale – At man skal gå frem for forrest for at råbe nogen an etc.


  2. Jeg har Descent til gode som oplevelse, men jeg synes vagt at genkende noget af det fra HeroQuest, hvor der også er terrænbrikker, hvor netop manifesteringen af andre ting på brættet får folk til at interagere med det (hvilket jeg har en ide til i mit næste indlæg om figurer).

    Din udforskningsbaserede ide lyder sjov, og det kunne være sjovt at efterprøve den. I Hinterland-stil kunne man opstille et mikro-supplement og så prøve efter, hvordan det fungerer, men vi kan evt. også prøve det i forbindelse med vores udforskning af borgen i The Gauntlet?


  3. Og så er det bedste oplæg vi har lige ved hånden. Jeg kommer først i gang med Hinterlandet: Temple of Elemental Evil efter efterårsferien, som det ser ud lige nu, men det kan være, at der kan eksperimenteres med figurer der?


  4. En hurtig kommentar herfra: Jeg har oplevet figurer decideret skabe rollespil, idet at de netop opfordrede til fysisk aktivitet. I dette tilfælde var det fordi at spilpersonerne (vi spillede Dark Heresy) var på en måne, hvor at de udnyttede den lavere tyngdekraft. Så spillerne sad med deres figurer og lod dem hoppe rundt på må og få og legede. Det var sjovt at opleve, for figurerne skabte i dette tilfælde rollespil (da det ikke var alle af spilpersonerne som mente at sådan noget med at have det sjovt var passende og pludseligt skulle forholde sig til at de morede sig pokkers godt med at hoppe rundt i 1/5 tyngdekraft).


  5. Undskyld at jeg sidetracker, men jeg fandt denne her på wiki under Chainmail (som udkommer et par år før D&D):
    “Famously, Chainmail also contains a set of castle siege rules which deals with mines and countermines. It suggests that underground wargames “are only possible to conduct on paper”.[14] Moreover, they require a third-party judge to supervise mining operations as players must not know the direction or extent of opposing mines. These rules created a precedent for a referee managing secret information about underground spaces on graph paper that would be followed by Dungeons & Dragons.”
    Som jeg læser den havde Gygax altså brugt figurer, hvis det havde været praktisk muligt. Ikke at det skulle være et argument for at gøre det nu, men sjovt på den der lidt nørdede historiske måde.


  6. Det er en interessant henvisning, men også en jeg skal have kigget nærmere på, da allerede “Braunstein”-krigsspillerne har en form for rollespil i sig, og brugen af en neutral tredjepart er i spil andre steder i krigsspillene (særligt når man vil spille med Fog of War) – men i alle fald en interessant reference i forbindelsen med udviklingen af de remedier, der bliver til rollespil senere hen.


  7. Jeg er netop ved at læse Role-Playing Mastery by G. Gygax, hvor jeg faldt over disse kommentarer som falder perfekt ind i afklaringen omkring figurer i rollespil. Peter Frost er lidt inde på samme i hans tidligere kommentar, men jeg synes nedenstående sætter hele udgangspunktet for figurernes vej til rollespil i et rigtig godt perspektiv.

    “One of these miniatures games, actually a booklet of game rules called Chainmail, made its first commercial appearance in 1971. While it was aimed at the re-creation of the warfare of the medieval and early Renaissance period, Chainmail included a small section (the “Fantasy Supplement”) that instructed players on the addition of fantasy elements into the war game of the Middle Ages. Thus heroes, spell-casting wizards, fire-breathing dragons, magic swords, giants, trolls, and werewolves began to appear in miniatures games across the country.”

    “Another groundbreaking feature was Chainmud’s section on man-to-man combat. This scale of activity was a departure from published (or even “house”) miniatures gaming rules. At that time, it was usual to have a single miniature figure represent ten, twenty, fifty, or even one hundred men in the game. The one-toone representation offered by Chainmail proved to be popular, especially when the fantasy components of play were used to create battles of a medieval world-that-never-was.”

    “Although the fact may have been only vaguely perceived as such at the time, this set of rules allowing one figure to represent one “man” was the breakthrough that led to the creation of the first role-playing game.”

    “I instructed the reader to use paper and pencil when dealing with the underground aspects of such battles. The mining, countermining, and secret escape routes employed during sieges were to be drawn out on graph paper. David L. Arneson, then of St. Paul, Minnesota, didn’t miss that. Soon Dave and I were corresponding and exchanging ideas, and a new game took shape. The Dungeons & Dragons Fantasy Role Playing Game was born out of Chainmail. The D&D game, as it is popularly called, sprang from the collaboration of Dave Arneson and yours truly in the two years immediately after Chainmail was published. The first version of the D&D game, now generally known as the Collector’s Edition, went on sale in January 1974. By a year later, some 1,000 copies of the game had been sold. At the time, it was the only role-playing game available.”

    “By the time the D&D Basic Set (the second edition of the game) was published in 1977, the game had fully evolved from its “accessory” status to a game system that stood alone.”


  8. Hej Rasmus,

    Tak for citatet. Jeg ender jo med at blive nødt til at læse den bog.
    I mellem tiden vil jeg udtrykke en anelse skepsis over teksten, da det her er Gygax’ tolkning af begivenhedsforløbet. Min skepsis er lidt på en tangent til emnet brug af figurer, og tager sit udgangspunkt i, at der fandt andre spil sted, som var med til at inspirere f.eks. Arneson til at med-udvikle D&D, og de har deres aspekter i en anden side af krigsspillene, som de blev udviklet under titlen Braunstein jf. blandt andet dette indlæg (hvor der er links til mere):


  9. Ja, du har sikkert ret i Gygax ikke kan tilskrives ene ophavsret til anvendelse af figurer i rollespil. Et godt link til videre “studie” du har. Gygax selv blev inspireret af H.G, Wells: H. G. Wells; “however, is usually credited as being the father of miniatures gaming. Mr. Wells formulated and published simple rules for military miniatures gaming in his book Little Wars, published a few years prior to World War I.”

    Men absolut jeg vil anbefale dig at læse Role-Playing Mastery by G. Gygax, der er virkelig mange tankevækkende elementer. Og jeg tror potentielt du vil finde den interessant ift. dit arbejde med Hinterlandet!


Skriv, skriv, skriv

Udfyld dine oplysninger nedenfor eller klik på et ikon for at logge ind: Logo

Du kommenterer med din konto. Log Out /  Skift )

Facebook photo

Du kommenterer med din Facebook konto. Log Out /  Skift )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: